Strictly speaking, a chemical weapon
relies on the physiological effects of a chemical, so agents used to
produce smoke or flame, as herbicides, or for riot control, are not
considered to be chemical weapons. Although certain chemical weapons
can be used to kill large numbers of people, as weapons of mass
destruction, other weapons are designed to injure or terrorise
people. In addition to having potentially horrific effects, chemical
weapons are of great concern because they are cheaper and easier to
manufacture and deliver than nuclear or biological weapons. Although
there are many thousands of chemical compounds that could
theoretically be used as chemical warfare agents, the actual number
that have been weaponised is relatively small, perhaps a few tens in
number.
The means available to adversaries for delivery of chemical weapons
range from specially designed, sophisticated weapon systems developed
by nations to relatively inefficient improvised devices employed by
terrorists and other disaffected individuals and groups. Any nation
with the political will and a minimal industrial capability could
produce chemical agents suitable for use in warfare. Efficient
weaponisation of these agents, however, does require design and
production skills usually found in countries that possess a munitions
development and production infrastructure or access to such skills
from cooperative sources. On the other hand, almost any nation or
group could fabricate crude agent dispersal devices. While such
methods may result in a small number of affected persons, the
psychological affect could be extremely significant.
Chemical agents have effects that can be immediate or delayed, can be
persistent or non-persistent, and can have significant physiological
effects. While relatively large quantities of an agent are required to
ensure an area remains contaminated over time, small-scale selective
use that exploits surprise can cause significant disruption and may
have lethal effects.
A
chemical weapon relies on the physiological effects of a chemical, so
agents used to produce smoke or flame, as herbicides, or for riot
control, are not considered to be chemical weapons. Although certain
chemical weapons can be used to kill large numbers of people, as
weapons of mass destruction, other weapons are designed to injure or
terrorise people. In addition to having potentially horrific effects,
chemical weapons are of great concern because they are cheaper and
easier to manufacture and deliver than nuclear or biological weapons.
Although there are many thousands of chemical compounds that could
theoretically be used as chemical warfare agents, the actual number
that have been weaponised is relatively small, perhaps a few tens in
number.
The means available to adversaries for delivery of chemical weapons
range from specially designed, sophisticated weapon systems developed
by nations to relatively inefficient improvised devices employed by
terrorists and other disaffected individuals and groups. Any nation
with the political will and a minimal industrial capability could
produce chemical agents suitable for use in warfare. Efficient
weaponisation of these agents, however, does require design and
production skills usually found in countries that possess a munitions
development and production infrastructure or access to such skills
from cooperative sources. On the other hand, almost any nation or
group could fabricate crude agent dispersal devices. While such
methods may result in a small number of affected persons, the
psychological affect could be extremely significant.
The use of poisons fell out of favor in the 18th and 19th century. In 1862 New York schoolteacher John W. Doughty wrote to the US Secretary of War suggesting methods of poison gas. This was dismissed and subsequently followed by a War Department General Order signed by President Abraham Lincoln stating that the use of poison should be "wholly excluded from modern warfare".
At the beginning of World War I, the use of chemical weapons was still very much taboo. Not only did mankind have a universal aversion to the use of poison but there was also the 1899 Hague Convention. The modern use of chemical weapons began when both sides to the conflict used poison gas to inflict agonising suffering and to cause significant battlefield casualties. The first agent was ethyl bromoacetate, a lachrymatory non-lethal agent. Such weapons basically consisted of well known commercial chemicals put into standard munitions such as grenades and artillery shells, or gases released from cylinders. Chlorine, phosgene (a choking agent) and mustard gas (which inflicts painful burns on the skin and causes significant damage to the respiratory system) were among the first chemicals used. Chlorine was the first lethal chemical used, at the 2nd Battle of Ypres. The results were indiscriminate and often devastating. Nearly 100,000 immediate deaths resulted and many more suffered long-term damage leading to death from conditions such as emphysema, some casualties survived for many years but suffered continuous respiratory ill health. Since World War I, chemical weapons have caused more than one million casualties globally.
As a result of public outrage, the Geneva Protocol, which prohibited the use of chemical weapons in warfare, was signed in 1925. While a welcome step, the Protocol had a number of significant shortcomings, including the fact that it did not prohibit the development, production or stockpiling of chemical weapons. Also problematic was the fact that many states that ratified the Protocol reserved the right to use prohibited weapons against states that were not party to the Protocol or as retaliation in kind if chemical weapons were used against them.
The chemicals employed before World War II can be styled as the "classic" chemical weapons. They are relatively simple substances, most of which were either common industrial chemicals or their derivatives. The classic chemical agents would be only marginally useful in modern warfare and generally only against an unsophisticated opponent, although they could be used in terrorist attacks, and have been used in Syria in modern times. Large quantities would be required to produce militarily significant effects, thus complicating logistics. In the case of terrorist attacks, relatively small amounts of an agent could cause significant casualties and disruption if used in some situations, for example in enclosed spaces such as shopping centres, concert halls or underground railway systems.
Chemical weapons were not used during WWII. Some claim of the use of Zyklon B, a commercial pesticide that released hydrogen cyanide gas, in the Nazi extermination camps was an example of chemical warfare. Zyklon B had been developed by by chemists Walter Heerdt, Bruno Tesch, and Gerhard Peters at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry in Dahlem and produced by Zyklon B gas was not a chemical weapon; it is not, and has never been, subject to any international disarmament bans. After World War I and during World War II, it was the most commonly used pesticide in the world. It was first used on September 3, 1941 in the Auschwitz death camp, by the initiative of the camp’s first deputy commandant Karl Fritzsch. The first victims were Soviet prisoners of war who had been taken to Auschwitz, and 250 sick Poles.
Although both the axis and allied powers experimented with CW agents during WWII, they were not used, the reasons may be that they were following the proscription on their use under the Geneva Protocol, or that all civilians and troops were equipped with respirators and other protective measures.
Gerhard Schrader, a 33-year-old German chemist at the IG Farben chemical company, created what he called Preparation 9/91, in 1936. Its intended use was as a pesticide, but it proved too effective and killed a wide range of organisms, including man. It was handed over to the military scientists of the Third Reich at Spandau Citadel, they were so impressed with its toxicity that they renamed the compound Tabun, the first nerve agent. He was paid 50,000 Marks (about $450,000 or £360,000 in 2022). Only two years later he developed another agent, Sarin. A third agent, Soman, was developed during the war. By the end of the war in excess of 50,000 tons of nerve agents had been produced, and many thousands of shells had been filled.
During the Cold War, many nations researched chemical agents, possibly as many as twenty-five in all. Major research was certainly carried out in the USA, USSR and the UK, and chemical agents were weaponised and stockpiled by them.
Work
in the UK was centred on the Chemical
Defence Experimental Establishment (CDEE), Porton. Ranajit
Ghosh, a chemist at ICI, was investigating a class of organophosphate
compounds for use as a pesticide. In 1954, ICI put one of them
on the market under the trade name Amiton.
It was subsequently withdrawn, as it was too toxic for safe use. The
toxicity did not go unnoticed, and samples of it were sent to Porton
Down for evaluation. After the evaluation was complete, several
members of this class of compounds were developed into a new group of
much more lethal nerve agents, the V agents. The best-known of these
is probably VX, assigned
the UK
Rainbow Code Purple Possum, with the
Russian V-Agent coming a close second (Amiton is largely forgotten as
VG). Other members of the V series are VE, VG, VM and VR.
On the defensive side, there were years of work to develop the means
of prophylaxis, therapy, rapid detection and identification,
decontamination and more effective protection of the body against
nerve agents, capable of exerting effects through the skin, the eyes
and respiratory tract.
Tests were carried out on servicemen to determine the effects of nerve
agents on human subjects, with one recorded death due to a nerve gas
experiment, that of 20 year old RAF airman Ronald
Maddison . It was 51 years before an inquest
found that he had died from sarin poisoning
In
the 1950s the Chemical Defence Experimental Establishment became
involved with the development of CS,
a riot control agent, and took an increasing role in trauma and wound
ballistics work. Both these facets of Porton Down's work had become
more important because of the situation in Northern Ireland.
In the early 1950s, nerve agents such as sarin were produced, about 20
tons were made from 1954 until 1956 at CDE Nancekuke, in
Cornwall. Nancekuke was an important factory for producing and
stockpiling chemical weapons. Small amounts of VX were produced there,
mainly for laboratory test purposes, but also to validate plant
designs and optimise chemical processes for potential mass
production. In the late 1950s, the chemical weapons production
plant at Nancekuke was mothballed, but was maintained through the
1960s and 1970s in a state whereby production of chemical weapons
could easily re-commence if required. The site closed in 1978, and
reverted to being RAF Portreath, a radar station. It is now Remote
Radar Head Portreath or RRH Portreath an air defence radar station
operated by the Royal Air Force, as part of Programme
HYDRA.
In
1958 the British government traded their VX technology
with the United States in exchange for information on thermonuclear
weapons and by 1961 the U.S. was producing large amounts of VX and performing its own
nerve agent research. This research produced at least three more
agents; the four agents (VE, VG, VM, VX) are
collectively known as the "V-Series" class of nerve agents.
Between 1951 and 1969, Dugway
Proving Ground was the site of testing for
various chemical and biological agents, including an open-air
aerodynamic dissemination test in 1968 that accidentally killed, on
neighboring farms, approximately 6,400 sheep by an unspecified nerve
agent.
From
1962 to 1973, the Department of Defense planned 134 tests that was
described as a chemical and biological weapons "vulnerability-testing
program", it was claimed at the time that harmless simulants were
used, but in n 2002, the Pentagon admitted that some of tests used
real chemical and biological weapons.
In October 2002, the Senate Armed Forces Subcommittee on Personnel
held hearings as the controversial news broke that chemical agents had
been tested on thousands of American military personnel. The hearings
were chaired by Senator Max Cleland, former VA administrator and
Vietnam War veteran.
Due
to the secrecy of the Soviet Union's government, very little
information was available about the direction and progress of the
Soviet chemical weapons until relatively recently. After the fall of
the Soviet Union, Russian chemist Vil
Mirzayanov published articles revealing
illegal chemical weapons experimentation in Russia.
In 1993, Mirzayanov was imprisoned and fired from his job at the State
Research Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology, where he
had worked for 26 years. In March 1994, after a major campaign by U.S.
scientists on his behalf, Mirzayanov was released. Among the
information related by Vil Mirzayanov was the direction of Soviet
research into the development of even more toxic nerve agents, which
saw most of its success during the mid-1980s. Several highly toxic
agents were developed during this period; the only unclassified
information regarding these agents is that they are known in the open
literature only as "Foliant" agents (named
after the program under which they were developed) and by various code
designations, such as A-230 and A-232.
According to Mirzayanov, the Soviets also developed binary weapons, in
which precursors for the nerve agents are mixed in a munition to
produce the agent just prior to its use. Because the precursors are
generally significantly less hazardous than the agents themselves,
this technique makes handling and transporting the munitions a great
deal simpler.
Additionally, precursors to the agents are usually much easier to
stabilize than the agents themselves, so this technique also made it
possible to increase the shelf life of the agents a great deal. During
the 1980s and 1990s, binary versions of several Soviet agents were
developed and designated "Novichok"
agents (after the Russian word for "newcomer").
Choking agents were employed first by the German army and later by the Allied forces in World War I. The first massive use of chemical weapons in that conflict came when the Germans released chlorine gas from thousands of cylinders along a 6-km (4-mile) front at Ypres, Belgium, on April 22, 1915, creating a wind-borne chemical cloud that opened a major breach in the lines of the unprepared French and Algerian units. Eventually both sides mastered the new techniques of using choking agents such as chlorine, phosgene, diphosgene, chloropicrin, ethyldichlorarsine and perfluoroisobutylene, and launched numerous attacks though without any militarily significant breakthroughs once each side had introduced the first crude gas masks and other protective measures.
Choking agents are delivered as gas clouds to the target area, where individuals become casualties through inhalation of the vapour. The toxic agent causes inflammation of the lungs and this causes fluids to build up in the lungs, which can cause death through asphyxiation. The effects may take up to three hours to be apparent. The long-term effects may last for many years.
Choking agents are not generally likely to be used in conventional warfare, but due to their ease of manufacture some have been used in recent years by countries that are not regarded as technologically advanced, and could also be used by terrorists.
Nerve agents are now divided into three series:
Despite what is frequently stated in the western press, there is no single substance known as Novichok. Novichok agents were developed in the 1950s through to the 1990s. They were designed as part of a Soviet programme codenamed FOLIANT. How many different agents were developed is unknown, although five are known, there are about 25 possible variants. The objectives were to produce agents that would penetrate NATO protective equipment, bypass the International Chemical Weapons conventions, and be more potent than previous nerve agents. A number of the Novichok agents were developed to be binary weapons, that is that two chemicals that were not covered by the current regulations could be combined at the point of use to produce the agent itself. There is some confusion, even in the scientific press, over the naming and chemical structures of various Novichoks. Effects are similar to other nerve agents.
The Corps were supplied with the S6 respirator from the mid 1960s, which had a serious disadvantage, they could not be used with a radio operator's microphone, or a telephone. Initially personnel requiring this facility were supplied with a WWII Civilian Duty Respirator with an updated filter canister.
The respirators shown are, from the left, the civilian duty respirator, the service respirator, and the S6.
For the detection of chemical agents, three methods were available, the Paper Detector, of which there were several versions for liquid gas, detector paint which could be coated onto any suitable surface and the Kit Vapour Detector. During training we sniffed chemicals which were meant to smell like some of the chemical agents.